Starting out
You don't know if your product is a medical device, and that uncertainty has a legal price
Selling an unregistered medical device in the UK carries an unlimited fine and criminal prosecution. For software products especially, the line between regulated and unregulated is genuinely contested, and the wrong call blocks NHS procurement entirely.
- steps
- 7
- steps
- to start
- 2 to 3 days
- to start
The short answer
Start with intended purpose: the words you use to describe what the product does decide whether it is a medical device and which class. Write that statement carefully, classify under both UK and EU rules, register with the MHRA before placing it on the GB market, and plan approved body time early if you are above class I. Private buyers increasingly ask for this before they will sign.
7 steps
Do it yourself: step by step
0 of 7 done
One paragraph: what the product does, for whom, in what setting, and what clinical decision it informs. Check it matches your website, deck and sales language.
- Time
- 2 to 3 days
- Typical cost
- Free
- Who does it
- Founder and clinical lead
Done when: One approved statement used everywhere.
This problem is Solvable.
Copy this template
Regulatory pathway decision sheet
Free to copy, adapt and use. No sign-up.
Regulatory pathway for [Product name], [date]
Intended purpose statement [Product name] is intended to [action] for [patient group] by [user type] in [setting] to support [clinical decision].
Is it a medical device? [Yes / No] Reasoning: [which function makes it a device or why it does not]
Classification
| Market | Regulation | Class | Rule applied | Approved or notified body needed? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Great Britain | UK MDR 2002 | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
| Northern Ireland | EU MDR | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
| EU | EU MDR | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] |
Marking route: [UKCA / CE (long-term GB recognition confirmed 21 October 2026; check current MHRA dates) / both]
Plan
| Workstream | Standard | Owner | Start | Finish | Budget |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quality management system | ISO 13485 | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | £[ ] |
| Risk management | ISO 14971 | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | £[ ] |
| Software lifecycle | IEC 62304 | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | £[ ] |
| Usability | IEC 62366-1 | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | £[ ] |
| Clinical evaluation | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | £[ ] |
| Post-market surveillance plan | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | £[ ] |
| Approved body assessment | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | £[ ] |
| MHRA registration | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | £[ ] |
| UK Responsible Person (if non-UK manufacturer) | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | [ ] | £[ ] |
Sales and marketing check
- Website, deck and proposals use only the intended purpose wording
- No claims beyond the current class and evidence
Avoid these
Common mistakes
- Marketing language that claims more than the intended purpose, which can change the class.
- Assuming software is unregulated because it is an app or uses AI.
- Classifying under UK rules only and then finding the EU class is higher.
- Contacting an approved body after the technical file is finished, then waiting months for a slot.
- Forgetting MHRA registration and a UK Responsible Person for non-UK manufacturers.

Free personal check
Done by Paul Robinson, not software
I'll read your intended purpose statement and give you a plain view of the regulatory route it points to
What I need from you
- Your intended purpose statement or product description
- Where you plan to sell: UK, EU or both
What you get
- A plain view on whether your wording points to a medical device
- The likely marking route and order of steps
- The three changes that matter most
Within 2 working days
No sign-in, no sales call. I read every request myself and reply on WhatsApp.
Free tools
Check where you stand
Benchmarks
On 21 October 2026 the government confirmed CE-marked medical devices and IVDs will be recognised in Great Britain on a long-term basis. The regulations are not yet made. Until then: MDD and AIMDD devices until 30 June 2028 (or certificate expiry); IVDD, EU MDR and EU IVDR devices until 30 June 2030
Check the current MHRA position before relying on CE marking alone
Source: GOV.UK and MHRA
First-time quality system and technical file for class IIa software typically costs £50,000 to £150,000 and takes 12 to 24 months including approved body review
Varies with in-house expertise and approved body capacity
Solvable estimate

Paul Robinson
14 years in UK private healthcare
I solve this one for healthcare companies
Want a hand? I'll look at your situation and tell you the three things I'd tackle first.
A few quick questions, about two minutes. I read every one myself and usually reply the same day.
No sales call unless you ask for one. Just a straight answer from me.
I reply personally, usually the same day.
Questions
Frequently asked questions
Is our clinical decision support software a medical device?
If it processes patient data to give an individual recommendation that informs diagnosis or treatment, it very likely is. Check MHRA guidance and get a written opinion.
Should we go UKCA or CE first?
If you sell in the EU too, CE first is often more efficient. On 21 October 2026 the government confirmed long-term GB recognition of CE marking, but the regulations are not yet made. If GB only, compare approved body availability and cost. Check the current MHRA position before deciding.
Do private providers check regulatory status?
Increasingly yes, through clinical governance and procurement questionnaires. A clear registration status shortens their checks.
Can we sell while waiting for certification?
Not as a medical device on the GB market. You may run research under the appropriate approvals, which is different from selling.
How long does class IIa take?
Commonly 12 to 24 months from a standing start, much of it quality system build and approved body review.
Last reviewed:
Sources
The Solvable community
You're not the only one with this problem.
One problem solved every week, on WhatsApp.
One message a week. No sales messages. Reply STOP any time.