For UK independent hospitals
Your self-pay prices haven't moved, but the market has
Most independent hospitals last reviewed their self-pay tariff years ago. With competitor positioning, patient expectations, and cost bases all shifting, static pricing quietly erodes margin, or loses you volume. Either way, you lose.
Two minutes. Solva follows up with specific pricing review options.
- Longer sales cycles for self-pay packages due to price objections
- High enquiry-to-conversion rates for certain procedures but low for others with similar clinical outcomes
- Competitors consistently undercutting or overcharging for comparable services
- Inconsistent pricing across different patient pathways or referral sources
- Increased administrative burden from handling pricing queries and adjustments
- Suboptimal utilisation of clinical capacity due to misaligned demand
- Loss of potential self-pay revenue, estimated to be 10-20% of total self-pay income
- Reduced profitability margins on high-volume procedures
- Perception of being overpriced or poor value for money
- Erosion of trust if pricing appears arbitrary or inconsistent
No verified UK data available for this specific claim.
Source: N/A
Frequently asked questions
Why does this problem persist?
Most independent hospitals set prices once and leave them. The self-pay market has changed significantly - patient expectations, competitor pricing, and cost bases have all shifted. Static pricing is almost always wrong.
What is the cost of leaving it unaddressed?
A 10% pricing improvement on £5m self-pay revenue is £500k, representing a direct financial benefit from pricing optimisation. (Internal Calculation, 2026)
This is exactly what I do with UK private practices. Answer the few questions above and I'll come back personally with where to start. Paul.