I don't know how to integrate AI voice notes with my electronic patient record system
"I know there are AI scribe tools out there but my EPR is a hospital system and I can't just plug something in. I don't know if integration is even possible."
Are you ready to integrate AI voice notes with your EPR?
The value depends on your systems, not a generic figure. Answer four questions for an integration-readiness read and where to start.
Answer all 4 questions to see your readiness.
Takes two minutes. A free, no-obligation chat with Solva.
- Cliniko, Heydoc, and Jane App, three of the most widely used UK private practice EPR platforms, all publish API documentation and list compatible AI scribe integrations that can be activated without custom development
- Heidi Health and Tali both offer a structured copy-paste interim workflow for EPR systems without native integration, allowing adoption within days while a formal integration is assessed
- The clinical time saved by AI transcription is the same regardless of whether the output is pushed directly to the EPR or copied manually, the interim workflow still delivers 40 to 55% of documentation time savings from day one
- Clinical documentation time remains high because an AI solution that could help is assumed to be incompatible
- The EPR becomes a perceived blocker to productivity improvement
- The practice falls behind in AI adoption while integration questions remain unresolved
- Clinician dissatisfaction with documentation burden continues without a clear resolution pathway
- Time and money that could be saved through AI tools remains unrealised
From Paul
I'll show you the three things costing you most, and what I'd fix first.
A few quick questions, about two minutes, and no typing. I read every one myself and reply with the three things costing you most and where I'd start. If it's useful, we talk. If not, you've still got a clear picture.
No obligation, no sales call unless you ask for one, and nothing automated lands in your inbox.
Paul, Solvable
Frequently asked questions
Why does this problem persist?
The EPR's integration capabilities have not been assessed AI scribe tools are evaluated without contacting the EPR vendor about compatibility The IT or implementation pathway for integration is not defined
What is the cost of leaving it unaddressed?
The clinical time recovered by removing manual transcription is the same regardless of integration method. A structured copy-paste workflow still saves 40 to 55% of documentation time while integration is resolved.
This is exactly what I do with UK private practices. Answer the few questions above and I'll come back personally with where to start. Paul.